European Leadership Development Programme 2005-2007, Course Evaluation April 06

KAROLINSKA INSTITUTET EVALUATION

Medical Management Centre

5 April 2006

 

EUROPEAN OPHTHALMOLOGY LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME

 

Did the programme meet your needs and expectations?

If yes, tell how. If no, tell why.

                 ″ Yes.

                 ″ Yes, innovative approach.

                 ″ Yes, lots of diverse topics. Extremely well organised.

                 ″ Yes, gave me the opportunity to approach some problems with different style.

                 ″ Yes, it gave an insight into problems usually not addressed in daily routine-work.

                 ″ -

                 ″ Yes, everything was very useful for me. Discussions were excellent.

                 ″ Yes, I have got good explanations about the topics which were covered by the "home-reading".

                 ″ In 70 % YES, it's really hard to organise a "leadership programme". I would rather call it a management programme.

                 ″ Yes.

                 ″ A detailed and professional overview of leadership and its impact in our activity.

                 ″ Yes, I came with an open mind and will take home several key points and issues to think about.

                 ″ Yes, both specific and broad.

What did you value most in the programme?

                 ″ The efficiency and structure of the talks

                 ″ Excellent moderated discussions

                 ″ Introduction to ??? law. Social programme.

                 ″ The evaluation/analysis of the strategies to lead

                 ″ The opportunity to interact

                 ″ -

                 ″ Discussions.

                 ″ The discussions (with and) to the politicians.

                 ″ To have the insight of decision making.

                 ″ Introduction sections, excellently ???

                 ″ Discussions.

                 ″ The active interaction between us all.

                 ″ Concrete topics, high quality discussions, professionally guided. 

What did disappoint you?

                 ″ Some of the lectures were very theoretical

                 ″ -

                 ″ Too much "leadership" talks. Lots of overlap.

                 ″ -

                 ″ Nothing

                 ″ -

                 ″ Nothing.

                 ″ Non.

                 ″ The weather.

                 ″ -

                 ″ Sincerely nothing.

                 ″ The visit to the Diabetes Association.

                 ″ First talk by Prof. Busse too long.

Were you satisfied with the balance between lectures and interactive sessions?

                 ″ Yes.

                 ″ Yes.

                 ″ GOOD.

                 ″ Yes.

                 ″ Yes.

                 ″ -

                 ″ Yes.

                 ″ Yes, I think that was kindly balanced.

                 ″ I think at this stage it was enough. (The participants did not know well each other).

                 ″ Yes.

                 ″ Satisfied.

                 ″ Yes.

                 ″ Yes.

What would you have preferred done differently?

                 ″ More interaction between the speakers and our group

                 ″ -

                 ″ (Even) more social programme

                 ″ -

                 ″ -

                 ″ -

                 ″ Access to the room.

                 ″ Non.

                 ″ Nothing.

                 ″ The programme should be less packed, perhaps.

                 ″ More open discussions.

                 ″ -

                 ″ ?

Did you find the pre-reading useful?

                 ″ No. Extremely detailed.

                 ″ It is useful.

                 ″ Yes

                 ″ -

                 ″ Yes

                 ″ -

                 ″ No.

                 ″ Yes.

                 ″ Yes, many thanks for that.

                 ″ Yes.

                 ″ Not all suggested papers.

                 ″ Of limited use.

                 ″ No.

What are your views on the prior information of the module and module arrangements?

                 ″ Very informative.

                 ″ Very good.

                 ″ Good, sufficient

                 ″ -

                 ″ -

                 ″ -

                 ″ Very good.

                 ″ Good introduction. Helped a lot to understand a little bit different topic and language than what we use in professional communication.

                 ″ It was perfect.

                 ″ I didn't have a lot of prior information but I was more than satisfied with the ???

                 ″ Information should be more detailed.

                 ″ -

                 ″ -